Nov 29, 2025 – Prayer Focus
Saturday, November 29. 2025 – The 24/7 National Strategic Prayer Call
“A CALL TO THE WALL…ONE NATION UNDER GOD”
1-712-770-4340 Code: 543555 # (Ongoing call…24 hours a day!)
We begin our hour by praising and giving thanks to God!
“Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for He Who promised is faithful.”
Hebrews 10:23
We sing: He’s Been Faithful
In my moments of fear, through every pain, every tear, there’s a God who’s been faithful to me.
When my strength was all gone, when my heart had no song, still in love, He’s proved faithful to me.
Every word He’s promised is true. What I thought was impossible, I’ve seen my God do.
He’s been faithful, faithful to me! Looking back, His love and mercy I see.
Though in my heart, I have questioned and failed to believe, He’s been faithful, faithful to me.
When my heart looked away, the many times I could not pray, still my God was faithful to me.
The days are spent so selfishly, reaching out for what pleased me, even then God was faithful to me.
Every time I come back to Him, He is waiting with open arms and I see once again
He’s been faithful, faithful to me! Looking back, His love and mercy I see.
Though in my heart, I have questioned and failed to believe, He’s been faithful, faithful to me.
In my heart, I have questioned and failed to believe, He’s been faithful, faithful to me!
~~~
For us to receive and put on the Ephesians 6 “full armor of God” as we begin each hour,
that we might be protected as we continue to “stand in the gap” for our beloved country!
Pray.
The key assignment for the 24/7 National Strategic Prayer Call is to intercede hourly
for the safety and security of our President, Donald John Trump,
and to pray for that which pertains to our nation!
We pray for his protection and ask that he be led by the Holy Spirit
so that he will discern truth and act for the good of the nation.
We bless our First Lady, Melania, their marriage and family, and cover them all with the Blood of Jesus.
Pray.
For those leaders that God has anointed, appointed, and elected,
as they take their places in the governments of each state and in our nation’s Capitol!
May they work together to clean up corruption in our government and restore our electoral system.
We also pray for the protection of members of this Administration,
especially those in the Cabinet, and law enforcement agencies, such as ICE, FBI, CBP, et al.
Pray.
For God’s blessing and intervention in the life of Joe Hoft and his family,
bringing a miraculous resolution to the issues threatening and attacking him!
Pray.
We will now spend the next 10 minutes praying for President Trump,
focusing our prayers against any demonic attacks against him.
Let him remain in good health, so he can serve his entire 4-year term as our 47th US President!
Pray.
Strategic Focus for Saturday
WELCOME THE KING OF GLORY INTO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ENGAGING IN A WARFARE OF LOVE, PRAYING FOR THE SALVATION OF OUR NATION
AND THE RESTORATION OF OUR FOUNDING PRINCIPLES – PART 312
“We have such trust through Christ toward God.
Not that we are sufficient of ourselves to think of anything as being from ourselves,
but our sufficiency is from God, Who also made us sufficient as ministers of the new covenant,
not of the letter but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life.”
2 Corinthians 3:4-6
REVIEW OF SCOTUS’ TARIFFS CASE – Part 2 – Justice Neil Gorsuch
During the November 5th oral arguments in the SCOTUS case regarding President Trump’s tariffs, Justice Neil Gorsuch, who is well known for his uncompromising principle of textualism (If Congress has not explicitly inscribed and delegated the precise tariff authority at issue, then that policy could likely be deemed unconstitutional), focused on the major-questions doctrine and non-delegation principle. Today, as we read and pray into our focus, let us ask the Lord to help Justice Gorsuch uphold and affirm President Trump’s position!

GORSUCH: “General Sauer,…You say that we shouldn’t be so concerned in the area of foreign affairs because of the President’s inherent powers. Why we should disregard both major questions and nondelegation. Could Congress delegate to the President the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations…to lay and collect duties as he sees fit?… Isn’t that the logic of your view?”
The situation described arises at the intersection of Article II’s foreign-commerce powers and Article I’s foreign affairs authority, made an urgent emergency by fifty years of catastrophic trade deficits. Two doctrines stand in the way: the non-delegation doctrine (prohibits Congress from delegating open-ended legislative power without clear guardrails…a doctrine dormant for ninety years but revived and enforced by the current Court starting in 2024–2025), and the major-questions doctrine (demands that any grant of major economic or political authority to the Executive be unmistakably clear and specific in the statutory text itself.) Together, these doctrines mean that broad phrases like “as the President deems necessary” in decades-old trade statutes like IEEPA are no longer sufficient to sustain sweeping reciprocal tariffs, no matter how dire the national interest.
Pray.
GORSUCH: “… I want you to explain to me how you draw the line, because you say we shouldn’t be concerned because this is foreign affairs, the President has inherent authority, and so delegation [is] off the books more or less…if that’s true, what would prohibit Congress from abdicating all responsibility to regulate foreign commerce, for that matter, declare war, to the President?”
Gorsuch’s concern about IEEPA’s “sweeping” breadth overlooks a half-century of SCOTUS precedent that grants the President far broader flexibility in foreign affairs than domestic. From Curtiss-Wright (1936) and Youngstown (1952) to Dames & Moore (1981), Regan v. Wald (1984) and Zivotofsky (2015), the Court has held that when foreign policy and foreign commerce intersect, the President – the “sole organ” representing the unified, national voice of U.S. foreign policy has “substantial authority and discretion in the field of foreign affairs.” His actions, under a Category 1 “express or implied authorization of Congress” (like IEEPA), receive the “widest latitude of judicial interpretation” and the “strongest of presumptions” of validity. Youngstown squarely repels demands that the statute contain overtly restrictive, ultra-precise wording.
The major questions doctrine has never been imposed on the President, only on domestic agencies. Yet neither Gorsuch nor Solicitor General Sauer confronted this precedentially settled foreign-affairs exceptionalism. Applying the major-questions doctrine or a revived non-delegation doctrine (a judicial 1-2 punch forged exclusively for domestic agency overreach) to the President’s conduct of foreign relations would overturn decades of precedent, and demand statutory language the Court never previously required. In short, it would virtually strip the Executive of the agility needed to respond to unforeseen crises.
SCOTUS has always applied exacting textual scrutiny to domestic agency actions (whether EPA emissions rules or student-loan cancellations) but deliberately withheld that same rigor from the President’s conduct of foreign affairs and national emergencies. History, precedent, and the Constitution’s own structure forbid transplanting the MQD legalism of the administrative state into the foreign affairs domain, where America’s economic survival and geopolitical leverage hang in the balance.
Pray.
GORSUCH: “You’re saying there’s inherent authority in all foreign affairs, to regulate commerce, duties … tariffs and war. It’s inherent authority all the way down. Fine. If Congress decides tomorrow, ‘we’re tired of this legislating business. We’re just going to hand it all off to the President.’ What would stop Congress from doing that?…You say we are not here to judge when it’s foreign affairs. That’s what I’m struggling with. You’d have to have some test and if it isn’t the intelligible principle test or something with more bite than that, you’re saying it’s something less. Well, what is that less?”
Gorsuch’s demand for a stricter “intelligible principle” in IEEPA is not the modest separation-of-powers housekeeping it appears to be. For nearly ninety years (beginning with Curtiss-Wright (1936) and reaffirmed in Youngstown, Dames & Moore, Regan v. Wald and Zivotofsky), the Supreme Court has deliberately refused to impose the same non-delegation rigor on presidential foreign-affairs authority that it applies to domestic agencies. The reason is simple: international crises do not arrive with advance notice or tidy statutory categories; they demand speed, secrecy, and a single national voice. In this sphere, the President is the Constitution’s “sole organ” confronting existential threats. Applying a rigid intelligible-principle test to IEEPA would silently overrule that entire line of precedent and handcuff the presidency at the worst possible moment. It would force the Requiring pre-approved statutory guardrails for every conceivable emergency subjects the President to Congressional paralysis while adversaries move at the speed of global markets. The Constitution’s text, structure and a century of precedent all reject that notion (that Congress must foresee every conceivable emergency before the President can protect the nation’s economic survival. Stripping the President of that flexible tool under the guise of textual purity would not restore Article I; it would constitute the most radical constriction of presidential power in foreign affairs the Court has ever imposed.
Pray.
GORSUCH: “You emphasize that Congress can always take back its powers. You mentioned that a couple of times. But don’t we have a serious retrieval problem here because, once Congress delegates by a bare majority and the President signs it — and, of course, every president will sign a law that gives him more authority — Congress can’t take that back without a super majority. And even then, it’s going to be veto-proof. What president’s ever going to give that power back? A pretty rare president. So how should that inform our view of delegations and major questions? In the real world, it can never get that power back….what happens when the President simply vetoes [a joint resolution to end a presidentially declared emergency] to try to take these [delegated] powers back? So Congress can’t get this power back once it’s handed it over to the President. It’s a one-way ratchet toward the gradual but continual accretion of power in the Executive branch and away from the people’s elected representatives [Congress]…It takes a super-majority, a veto-proof majority to get it back.”
Gorsuch’s non-delegation objection (Congress giving away too much power to the President) is his single strongest structural argument: once Congress surrenders an Article I power, (like regulating foreign commerce through tariffs, by simple majority,) reclaiming it requires a veto-proof two-thirds supermajority in both chambers, making it more difficult for Congress to take back Article I power than it is to delegate it. Yet the point cuts both ways. IEEPA was enacted just as America’s half-century trade hemorrhage was beginning, and is now 48 years old. Should the Court strike down the tariff authority on non-delegation or major-questions grounds, logic and consistency demand that the entirety of IEEPA itself (not merely its tariff applications) be invalidated and sent back to Congress for a 21st-century overhaul, enacting a new, unambiguous IEEPA 2.0, restoring and strengthening the President’s power to protect our economy and security. Turn any judicial “error” into national renewal, for Your glory. (Anything less than a ruling that surgically disables only the tariff tool while leaving the rest of IEEPA’s emergency arsenal intact, would expose the decision for what it would be: not a principled restoration of Article I but rather a targeted judicial strike against the most visible and effective element of President Trump’s diplomatic and economic policies.)
Pray.
For 90 years, SCOTUS has read the Constitution’s foreign-affairs clauses according to the “spirit of the law” rather than the “letter of the law.” Foreign affairs powers are honored, and action by the President is shielded so the nation speaks with a unified national voice when its lifeblood is at stake. An agency-choking “textual straitjacket” has never been fastened on a President facing hostile powers in real time. Rather than judicial restraint, it would be an attempt of a hypocritical, censoring spirit to impose its will on the Court! While Pharisees weaponized the letter of the law to crucify individuals, allowing that to prevail in this SCOTUS case could kill the nation. We say NO to that spirit, and YES to the tariffs!
Pray.
We pray:
Spare the Justices of the US Supreme Court from the attacks of Pharisaical legalism. Give Justices Gorsuch and Roberts the wisdom to uphold the “spirit of the law” so that President Trump is not “disarmed,” but is fully functioning on behalf of our nation at this hour of history. Pray.
That Justice Gorsuch will thoroughly review the body of settled law (previous rulings that have been made in support of President Trump’s position in this case) and rule in favor of President Trump, ensuring him a final victory. Pray.
That the people of our nation will stand alongside President Trump, and remain engaged in this BATTLE TO SAVE AMERICA until VICTORY is won! Pray.
Protect, strengthen and cover our 24/7 family in the Blood of Jesus against all warfare and witchcraft. Bring in new intercessors, in particular, Godly men and those of the next generation who are called to this assignment with us, to pray for our President and our beloved nation! Prepare us for our NEXT STEPS in this Battle to Save America! Pray.
(Resource: SCOTUS Website)
~~~
Listen to the song ahead of time, then either sing or pray it!
~~~
HINENI, ADONAI! HERE I AM, LORD!
ENGAGING IN A WARFARE OF LOVE! THE BATTLE OF THE BRIDE!
KADIMA! ONWARD…FORWARD!
“LAYNA!” LIGHT AND TRUTH!
BE STRONG…COURAGEOUS…BRAVE!
UNASHAMED OF THE GOSPEL OF CHRIST!
GOD’S CHAMPIONS FOR LIFE!
MARANATHA! COME, LORD JESUS!
BE READY! REVIVAL IS COMING!
ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL!
ONE NEW MAN!
VICTORY!
STANDING IN THE GAP!
REVIVAL – from Heart to heart!
PARENTAL CARE and CHRISTIAN LOVE for ALL CHILDREN!
UNITE US! FOR THE KING AND HIS KINGDOM, FROM GENERATION TO GENERATION!
~~~
To print, use the attached PDF file
https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:VA6C2:aa621e01-fd26-4459-bc1c-f2ff10f0cf03