Nov 30, 2025 – Prayer Focus
Sunday, November 30. 2025 – The 24/7 National Strategic Prayer Call
“A CALL TO THE WALL…ONE NATION UNDER GOD”
1-712-770-4340 Code: 543555 # (Ongoing call…24 hours a day!)
We begin our hour by praising and giving thanks to God!
“My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior,
for he has looked on the humble estate of his servant.
For behold, from now on all generations will call me blessed;
for He Who is mighty has done great things for me,
and Holy is His Name.”
Luke 1:45-49
We sing: Holy Is His Name
My soul proclaims the greatness of the Lord and my spirit exalts in God my Savior.
For He has looked with mercy on my lowliness and my name will be forever exalted.
For the mighty God has done great things for me and His mercy will reach from age to age
And holy, holy, holy is His Name!
He has mercy in every generation. He has revealed His power and His glory.
He has cast down the mighty in their arrogance and has lifted up the meek and the lonely.
He has come to help His servant Israel. He remembered His promise to our fathers.
And holy, holy, holy is His Name! Holy, holy, holy is His Name!
And holy, holy, holy is His Name! Holy, holy, holy is His Name!
~~~
For us to receive and put on the Ephesians 6 “full armor of God” as we begin each hour,
that we might be protected as we continue to “stand in the gap” for our beloved country!
Pray.
The key assignment for the 24/7 National Strategic Prayer Call is to intercede hourly
for the safety and security of our President, Donald John Trump,
and to pray for that which pertains to our nation!
We pray for his protection and ask that he be led by the Holy Spirit
so that he will discern truth and act for the good of the nation.
We bless our First Lady, Melania, their marriage and family, and cover them all with the Blood of Jesus.
Pray.
For those leaders that God has anointed, appointed, and elected,
as they take their places in the governments of each state and in our nation’s Capitol!
May they work together to clean up corruption in our government and restore our electoral system.
We also pray for the protection of members of this Administration,
especially those in the Cabinet, and law enforcement agencies, such as ICE, FBI, CBP, et al.
Pray.
For God’s blessing and intervention in the lives of Joe Hoft and Tina Peters,
as they both need miraculous resolutions to the issues threatening and attacking them!
Pray.
We will now spend the next 10 minutes praying for President Trump,
focusing our prayers against any demonic attacks against him.
Let him remain in good health, so he can serve his entire 4-year term as our 47th US President!
Pray.
Strategic Focus for Sunday
WELCOME THE KING OF GLORY INTO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ENGAGING IN A WARFARE OF LOVE, PRAYING FOR THE SALVATION OF OUR NATION
AND THE RESTORATION OF OUR FOUNDING PRINCIPLES – PART 313
“We, through the Spirit, eagerly wait for the hope of righteousness by faith.”
Galatians 5:5
REVIEW OF SCOTUS’ TARIFFS CASE – Part 3 – Justice Amy Coney Barrett
During the November 5th oral arguments in the SCOTUS tariffs case, Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s questions to Solicitor General Sauer reflected what she is known for: adhering to a rigorous form of originalism (interpreting the Constitution according to its original public meaning; the understanding it held for an informed observer at the time of ratification, rather than evolving with modern values.) Barrett, as a protégé of past (and now deceased) Justice Antonin Scalia, views the ratified text as “fixed law”, prioritizing historical context and textual fidelity to constrain judicial discretion and avoid “activist” or partisan policymaking. In practice, she demands precise evidence of original intent or longstanding gloss (added layer of interpretation or explanation of the text or case to fit modern-day context) before expanding executive powers, blending skepticism of loose readings with deference to founding-era precedents. As we read, let us “eagerly wait for the hope of righteousness by faith” as we pray that she will make the right determination, supporting President Trump in this critical case!
Question: Does The Historical Pedigree of “Regulate Importation” Include Tariffs?
BARRETT: “Can you point to any other place in the Code or any other time in history where that phrase together, “regulate … importation” has been used to confer tariff-imposing authority?
SAUER: “We rely on historical sources to show there’s this long historical pedigree…going back to Gibbons v. Ogden, all the way through McGoldrick and Board of Trustees, where this Court and founding-era sources say the power to tariff includes the power to regulate commerce.
Regarding United States v. Yoshida International, Inc. (1975), a federal appellate court stated that “We therefore hold that the President’s imposition of the 10% supplemental duty under the authority of section 5(b) was lawful.” The DC Circuit squarely upheld President Nixon’s 10% across-the-board import surcharge as a lawful exercise of the President’s authority under the exact TWEA (Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917) language (“regulate … importation”) that Congress deliberately carried over — word-for-word — into IEEPA two years later in 1977. Because Congress reenacted the identical phrase after a lower court ruling had already construed it to authorize a broad tariff-style duty, the most natural inference is that Congress ratified and incorporated Yoshida’s understanding: “regulate … importation” as broad enough to include the imposition of monetary duties on imports.
Pray.
Question: Are IEEPA’s Nine Verbs Broad Enough to Include Monetary Exactions?
BARRETT: You’ve referred to the other verbs in IEEPA as capacious …“nullify” and “void” have definite meanings…“regulate” is a broader term…So can you describe what you mean by “capacious”?*
SAUER: If you look at all nine verbs together…from “nullify,” “block,” “prohibit,” “void,” to “direct,” “compel,” … “regulate”… you can see the intention of Congress to cover the waterfront.
In Federal Energy Administration v. Algonquin SNG, Inc. (1976), the Court upheld President Nixon’s oil license fees (that functioned exactly like tariffs) under Section 232’s phrase “adjust the imports”. The Court’s ruling opinion in Algonquin clearly stated that the “methods chosen by the President (license fees increasing in amount with the volume of petroleum imported) are plainly within the statute.” The Algonquin case found that Section 232’s language is narrower than IEEPA’s nine-verb spectrum, yet the Court still found monetary exactions of license fees that function exactly like tariffs “plainly within” the delegation of Section 232, making IEEPA a fortiori.
Pray.
Question: Is There a Meaningful Difference Between a Tariff and a License Fee?
BARRETT: Algonquin was very careful to always call a license and a licensing fee as separate terms that don’t always go together…So tell me what the distinction is between licenses and fees, and if it matters … why couldn’t you just call this a license that doesn’t always involve a fee, such as a tariff?
GENERAL SAUER: It’s hard for me to see a separation between a license and a licensing fee or even the relevance of the distinction.”
Here, Barrett is probing whether there’s a substantive or formal distinction between a “license” (a permission to engage in an activity) and a “licensing fee” (a monetary charge tied to that permission). Drawing from the Algonquin case (where the Court carefully used these terms separately, suggesting they aren’t always bundled), Barrett was testing whether tariff authority relies on functional equivalence (economic impact) over statutory text (specific words like “license” without an automatic fee). Sauer responds to her objection of the license and licensing fee being separable as almost beside the point. Even with the license and fee being separable, the Chief Executive has been upheld by the Court imposing the fee alone, with zero licensing framework, for 170 years, based on the three wartime cases of Cross v. Harrison, Hamilton v. Dillin, and Dooley v. United States.
Pray.
In all the aforementioned precedents, the Supreme Court has never once suggested…much less held…that “regulate importation” excludes tariffs, yet, despite tariff authority being the quintessential application of the IEEPA phrase “regulate importation” the explicit absence of the word “tariff” in IEEPA is enough to sway the textual leanings of the Court to potentially challenge President Trump’s geopolitical and economic authority and endanger the strength of the American economy. Congress wrote IEEPA as a natural update to TWEA, a previous piece of legislation that explicitly tied tariff authority with “regulate importation” in its verbiage. Congress felt that tariff authority and the delegation to “regulate importation” were so nearly synonymous that it did not find it necessary to explicitly say the word “tariff” in IEEPA because the phrase “regulate importation” had clearly implied tariff authority in TWEA. President Trump’s tariff authority, therefore, represents the faithful, predictable, and constitutionally authorized use of power by Congress, deliberately placed in executive hands.
Pray.
We pray:
That Justice Barrett’s textual fidelity would not artificially narrow a broad, historically grounded delegation just because the word “tariff” is absent; that she would uphold the full foreign-commerce power Congress unmistakably placed in executive hands for national emergencies, and rule in favor of President Trump. Pray.
That Justice Barrett’s rigorous originalism would see the IEEPA phrase “regulate importation” as the Founders and every precedent understood it…necessarily including tariffs… and uphold the President’s IEEPA tariff authority, ensuring him a final victory. Pray.
That the people of our nation will stand alongside President Trump, and remain engaged in this BATTLE TO SAVE AMERICA until VICTORY is won! Pray.
Protect, strengthen and cover our 24/7 family in the Blood of Jesus against all warfare and witchcraft. Bring in new intercessors, in particular, Godly men and those of the next generation who are called to this assignment with us, to pray for our President and our beloved nation! Prepare us for our NEXT STEPS in this Battle to Save America! Pray.
(Resource: SCOTUS Website)
~~~
Listen to the song ahead of time, then either sing or pray it!
~~~
HINENI, ADONAI! HERE I AM, LORD!
ENGAGING IN A WARFARE OF LOVE! THE BATTLE OF THE BRIDE!
KADIMA! ONWARD…FORWARD!
“LAYNA!” LIGHT AND TRUTH!
BE STRONG…COURAGEOUS…BRAVE!
UNASHAMED OF THE GOSPEL OF CHRIST!
GOD’S CHAMPIONS FOR LIFE!
MARANATHA! COME, LORD JESUS!
BE READY! REVIVAL IS COMING!
ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL!
ONE NEW MAN!
VICTORY!
STANDING IN THE GAP!
REVIVAL – from Heart to heart!
PARENTAL CARE and CHRISTIAN LOVE for ALL CHILDREN!
UNITE US! FOR THE KING AND HIS KINGDOM, FROM GENERATION TO GENERATION!
~~~
To print, use the attached PDF file
https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:VA6C2:a3560bab-dd38-4505-98e8-9a6230bea0e5